Peer Review Process
ICAIML-AE 2026 follows a rigorous double-blind peer review process to ensure high standards of academic quality and integrity.
-
Initial Screening:
1.All submissions undergo an initial similarity and compliance check. Papers exceeding the acceptable similarity threshold (10% including references and all sources) or violating ethical policies may be rejected without external review. Papers found to be plagiarized at any stage may be rejected or retracted.
-
Reviewer Assignment:
Submissions that pass the initial screening are assigned to a minimum of three independent reviewers with relevant expertise, drawn from the Program Committee and external experts.
-
Double-Blind Review:
Reviewers evaluate submissions based on:
-
Originality and significance
- Technical quality and soundness
- Relevance to conference themes
- Clarity and organization
- Contribution to the field
-
Reviewer Feedback:
Reviewers provide detailed comments and recommendations: accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
-
Decision Making:
5.Final decisions are made by the Program Chairs based on reviewer reports. In case of conflicting reviews, additional expert input may be sought.
-
Revision and Resubmission:
Authors of revision papers must submit revised manuscripts within the specified timeline, addressing all reviewer comments.
-
Final Acceptance and Notification:
Accepted papers are notified to the authors, and the final camera-ready version is requested for inclusion in the conference proceedings. Authors must ensure compliance with formatting and copyright requirements.